I’ll never forget the time that an associate professor at a Christian college sniffed as he told me my faults. I didn’t understand scripture or how to preach, according to him. He then said “You see, you just don’t understand academia.”

At the time he said that, he was still writing his dissertation for his doctorate — and had been for a couple years. I, on the other hand, had earned two doctoral degrees in science. I decided not to try to play trump card with the guy, but, rather, to use the moment to remind myself of how easy it is to get carried away with your own sense of self importance. I am not immune to that, I’m sure.

One thing that helps me deflate my head is reviewing what we studied and what I wrote and taught back when I was getting those degrees. Almost all of the things we confidently asserted are now considered primitive or just plain wrong. I keep waiting for them to show up at my door and demand the degrees back. They could say something like “Since everything you learned was rubbish or tainted by rubbish, we have to rescind your degrees.” And, you know what? I couldn’t argue with them.

I learned all kinds of things about the immune system which we now know were wrong. We were, we insisted, on the cusp of using interferon to cure all kinds of viral illnesses. Nope. We knew, we told one and all, how to use nutrition and vitamins to turn around many major diseases. Now, twenty years later, we know a lot more about our genetic code and how it affects our ability to ward off illnesses and we know a lot more about vitamins; and everything we know contradicts what I wrote and talked about back then.

I really pushed vitamins back then but every single long term double blind study done on vitamins show a net negative effect for those who take a multi-vitamin mineral every day. And vitamin C? Linus Pauling was dead wrong (and, in fact, he is now dead, as well). There is no correlation between taking vitamin C and resisting or defeating a cold. There is also nothing natural about taking most vitamins. For example, if you are eating an orange, you are probably getting the vitamin C you need today just from that one piece of fruit. Most oranges have about 60mg of C in them and that is about all the human body can work with during a single day. To take a thousand milligram tablet of vitamin C is not natural — it is using C as a drug and all drugs have side effects, including drug-level doses of vitamins. Natural? C’mon, people, Adam and Eve could have eaten fruit all day in the garden and not gotten near that amount of C in their systems. And let’s not even discuss what it would have done to their bowels. I have about a hundred other examples of this — like the long term studies on vitamin E which show that those who take the dosage recommended by the vitamin companies have MORE heart disease than those who don’t take any at all.

I knew a lot about bursa cells, NK cells, T cells, etc. but most of that knowledge has now been replaced with much better research. I suspect that what we know now will also be replaced in fairly short order.

This has been good for me. I need to face the fact that all my degrees and the letters after my name prove is that I mastered what isn’t so! Sadly, in much of academia, there is no double blind study forcing the professors to face the fact that they don’t know what they think they know and what they DO know, ain’t so! A double blind study can show me I was right or I was wrong about using visualization to aid healing, but a professor spouting off socialism or rewritten history has no check on him, no study coming down the line that will knock him off his pulpit. The only ones who check on him and vet him are those who already agree with him/her.

I don’t understand academia? Au contraire. I know that academia is the only place where blind assertions and intellectual incest are considered good things, not to be questioned by those outside the sacred circle and not to be sullied by tacky things like facts. (in some disciplines, only. Hard science has a way of cleaning house every so often — but not often enough)

So what was the value of my Ph.D.s? I learned how to learn, how to research, how to write, and how to say “I was wrong.” A lot of university disciplines don’t teach those things but my instructors and mentors certainly did. I didn’t study so I could get degrees — I got degrees while I was studying. That is a crucial difference, in my mind. My target wasn’t the degree, but the knowledge. And the knowledge brought humility (to be fair, I have found that my knowledge often brings me puffery and pride… for a moment… and then it pops my balloon).

I know my kids, both of whom are in university (Kara has returned to get a Masters), will learn things that bother them. Some of those things will be true, some won’t be, but only time and better research will tell. Some schools are, quite frankly, not worth the money for they will not prepare you for a job or they will charge too much to prepare you (Dave Ramsey quotes the case of one young woman with a Masters in Social Work and $120,000 in college debt… for a job that will top out at $60K a year after ten to twenty years of climbing the ladder).

The greatest thing I learned while getting my degrees was that there was too much out there for me to know it all, so I should quit acting like I do. THAT’S a lesson that hasn’t become outdated through the years.