Mistake, Weakness, Failure, or Rebellion? question 176

Posted by Patrick Mead on May 5th, 2009

Sometimes a questioner shows me where I left something hanging or where I really didn’t make my point as well as I should. I appreciate that! Too many people read these blogs for me to be lackadaisical about the answers, especially if my answers leave the wrong impression.

Regarding the security of our salvation, I have a follow-up question. About point #2 “consistent, nonrepentant sexual immorality”, why is “nonrepentant” specific to this sin? Why would consistent, nonrepentant child abuse or consistent, nonrepentant lying or consistent, nonrepentant not sharing with others not bring the same result?

The questioner is referring back to a blog I wrote some time ago about what sins would be so bad that they might negate our salvation. I was asked if there were sins so bad that our state would return to what it was before our baptism. The Bible says that there are three sins in that category and I listed them thusly:
1. Denying that Jesus is the Son of God. (as in John’s epistles)
2. Persistent, nonrepentant sexual immorality (as in Corinthians)
3. Being divisive (or “heretic” — found in several places, including Timothy and Titus)

The questioner is right — with one proviso: if a person knowingly sins and yet refuses to repent, they are in danger of losing their soul. In that case, they are in rebellion. There is a huge difference between sinning because of a mistake, ignorance, a weakness, or a failure to execute and sinning because you decide that your will is superior to God’s. Let’s define some terms.

A “mistake” is exactly that — something we did unintentionally. It might be a sin of omission or commission and it might have been committed out of carelessness or ignorance, but it wasn’t intentional. Most of us would admit that we’ve made lots of mistakes and we expect to continue to make them.

A “weakness” is a hole in our defenses. There might be many such holes but most of us have at least one — whether we know it or not. We tend to judge those with different weaknesses as inferior to us. For example, the egotist may understand his weakness and wish it would magically disappear, but he doesn’t despise himself. He despises alcoholics, though, because he can’t empathize with them. The alcoholic despises the porn addict who despises the charlatan who… you get the point. All of us need to recognize our weaknesses and take precautions such as joining accountability groups or rearranging our lives to avoid the thing that makes us fall. If we get comfortable with our weaknesses, it is easy to fall into rebellion.

A “failure” is when we don’t live up to the standard we have set for ourselves (usually, we set that standard because we believe it pleases God).

I slipped in the word “unrepentant” in the line on sexual sin because, in the Corinthian example, the man was committing sexual sin and rather proud of it (he later repented). God never tells us to drop people who have made a sexual mistake or who — to put it another way — failed. I have found churches to be far too eager to judge such people (perhaps in fear of their own sexual cravings and weakness or, less likely, because they don’t share that particular weakness). We need to stress that sexual sin wasn’t the thing that caused this man to be put out of the church — it was that his sin was persistent and nonrepentant. It wasn’t a mistake — it was rebellion, hubris, and willfulness.

Add rebellion, hubris, or willfulness to any sin and, yes, it becomes fatal, spiritually. Remember the phrase “the soul that sinneth, it shall die”? (Ezekiel 18:20) In context, it was correcting the idea that sins were inherited. Each person, Ezekiel said, was judged according to their own sins, not those of their sons or fathers. However, this applies to our discussion because of two things: first, in the King James, the “eth” on the end of a verb form indicates a continuing action. In other words, it isn’t “the soul that sins will die” but “the soul that continues to sin shall die.” Think of Mark 16:15,16 where we are told — again in the KJV — that “he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.” The “believing” is continual action — not to be ended.

A person who continues to sin — in rebellion — will forfeit their salvation. However, Ezekiel gives us this good news: “But if a wicked man turns away from all the sins he has committed and keeps all my decrees and does what is just and right, he will surely live; he will not die.”

6 Responses

  1. Danny Gill Says:

    Bravo! Hear, hear!

    We in the church have somehow decided that sexual sin is the one thing we cannot even talk about . . . except in gossip, of course.

    I counsel, support, encourage men who are trying to climb out of sexual sin, especially related to pornography. I’ve been down that road, and it is filled with lies, death, and destruction. I am so, so grateful that our elders don’t consider this something to be swept under the rug. I have many men who come to me because they cannot get any help in their home churches. IF they can get past the shame of being authentic about their sin, they’re told “Oh, we don’t have much problem with that here.” It’s a lie straight from the pit of hell.

    Whew! Thanks for letting me vent.

  2. Greg England Says:

    When I was preaching in Long Beach, my elders knew all about my battles with certain sins and were gracious to hold up God’s standard, and hold me accountable in love … knowing they, too, were saved only by God’s grace. It was the only church in which I’ve served with such elders.

  3. Pilgrim Says:

    Patrick, Thank you for your response to this question. This answer helps me clarify some issues in my mind. And it helps to make the peace and joy of salvation in Christ more real for me. Thank you for the definitions. I am hopeful in trying to deal with my own sins more constructively and in trying to look at other people less judgmentally.

  4. Dale Says:

    Please send me info on your Christian Evidences Seminars.
    Thanks,
    Dale

  5. Eric Says:

    I was in a very good Bible study years ago where the teacher pointed out a distinct difference between comitting a sin and being a sinner. He wasn’t nearly as succinct as Patrick (45 minutes versus a few paragraphs), but both that study and this blog make me compare and contrast what we’ve been telling each other for years: “we are worthless sinners unworthy of God’s grace” versus what God calls us: “called out”, “saints,” etc. Think of the difference that could be made by putting God’s thoughts into our head’s rather than beating each other down with what we’ve been saying.

    And if this sounds too wacky, watch that movie they show in diversity classes on the brown eye-blue eye experiment, and notice how the kids react depending on what they’re told. Those told they were bad acted bad, and vice versa. Consider the effect on people, especially younger people, if we told them they were saints rather than sinners, that God called them to be his special people. That every error didn’t lead to eternal condemnation, but rather that our Father loves us and wants us to do better the next time.

  6. Alan Nesbitt Says:

    Does making a mistake necessarily mean one commits a sin? If Jesus was all man and “grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man” and He “learned obedience from the things He suffered, and once being made perfect”, am I wrong in concluding that Jesus made mistakes? No one can dispute that Jesus knew no sin and was the spotless Lamb of God. The answer to this may be in another entry so please excuse the newbie. Thanks!

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.